The Academic Landscape of Turkish Rectors: Unveiling Career Paths, H-Index, and Scholarly Output

Abstract: This article delves into a comprehensive analysis of the academic qualifications of Turkish rectors, examining their career trajectories, H-index scores, and scholarly contributions. The study scrutinizes the current rectors of 197 universities in Turkey, categorizing them into distinct groups based on sociodemographic characteristics, academic accomplishments, and career paths. Drawing from a prosopographical approach and data from official university websites, as well as Web of Science and Scopus databases, the study reveals intriguing insights into the academic leadership landscape. The findings exhibit a dichotomy between rectors with predominantly domestic academic backgrounds and those with international education experiences. The former group tends to exhibit lower academic qualifications and weaker scholarly outputs, often aligned with prevailing political ideologies, while the latter group showcases robust academic credentials and higher scholarly achievements, often emphasizing student success. This article employs an incisive and critical lens to unravel the intricacies of the academic qualifications of Turkish rectors, offering both historical context and contemporary analysis.

Keywords: Academic qualifications, Rectors, Higher education, Career development, H-index, Scholarly output, Turkey, Sociodemographic characteristics, Prosopography

Introduction: The role of rectors in shaping the trajectory of higher education institutions is undeniably significant. This study undertakes a rigorous investigation into the academic qualifications of Turkish rectors, focusing on their career trajectories, H-index scores, and scholarly contributions. As the Turkish higher education landscape evolves, understanding the diverse pathways and academic achievements of rectors provides valuable insights into the prevailing trends and challenges within the sector. By applying a prosopographical approach and meticulously collecting data from official university websites, as well as the reputable Web of Science and Scopus databases, this study unveils a nuanced portrait of the academic leadership in Turkish universities.

Career Trajectories and Sociodemographic Characteristics: The study discerns two distinct groups of rectors, each characterized by unique career trajectories and sociodemographic attributes. The first group comprises rectors with primarily domestic academic backgrounds, often having graduated from Turkish universities. Despite holding leadership positions, this group demonstrates lower academic qualifications, as evidenced by a diminished number of published articles, citations, and lower H-index scores. Intriguingly, this group’s social media posts frequently express allegiance to the governing ideology, raising questions about potential ideological influences on academic performance. Furthermore, the universities managed by these rectors exhibit subpar academic achievements, indicating a potential correlation between academic leadership and institutional performance.

Academic Excellence and International Exposure: Conversely, the second group of rectors emerges as a cohort with diverse international academic experiences, often graduating from foreign universities. This group showcases higher academic qualifications, reflected in a greater number of published articles, citations, and elevated H-index scores. Their social media engagement underscores a commitment to student success and academic achievements, signaling a focus on the scholarly growth of their institutions. Notably, the universities led by these rectors demonstrate commendable academic performance, further highlighting the potential positive impact of rectors’ academic excellence on institutional success.

Historical Context and Contemporary Implications: To contextualize these findings, historical precedents and global academic trends are considered. The emergence of a dichotomy between rectors with varying academic backgrounds mirrors historical patterns observed in other contexts. The article draws parallels with international studies on academic leadership, demonstrating the significance of academic qualifications in steering institutions toward excellence. Moreover, the study’s findings carry contemporary implications for policy-makers, university stakeholders, and academic communities in Turkey and beyond. By critically evaluating the link between rectors’ academic qualifications and institutional achievements, this research advocates for informed decision-making in academic leadership appointments.

Conclusion: This article critically examines the academic qualifications of Turkish rectors, shedding light on the diverse career paths, H-index scores, and scholarly outputs within the academic leadership landscape. The identified dichotomy between rectors with domestic and international academic backgrounds underscores the potential impact of academic qualifications on institutional performance. By scrutinizing the sociodemographic characteristics and career trajectories of rectors, this study contributes to a nuanced understanding of academic leadership and its implications for higher education institutions. Ultimately, the article calls for a reinvigorated discourse on the criteria for appointing academic leaders, emphasizing the pivotal role of academic excellence in shaping the future of Turkish universities.

References:

1. Karadag, E. (2021). Academic (dis)qualifications of Turkish rectors: their career paths, H-index, and the number of articles and citations. Higher Education, 81(2), 301–323. [1]
2. Achola, P. P. W., & Aseka, E. M. (2001). Searching for and accessing senior managers for public universities in Africa: challenges and opportunities. International Conference on Leadership and Management of Higher Education for Efficacy in Africa at Kenyatta University. Nairobi. [2]
3. Altbach, P. G. (2001). Academic freedom: International realities and challenges. Higher Education, 41, 205–219. [3]
4. Altbach, P. G., Yudkevich, M., & Rumbley, L. E. (2015). Academic inbreeding: local challenge, global problem. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3), 317–330. [4]
5. Arabaci, İ. B. (2011). Organizational climate of Fırat University. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 161–180. [5]